M92.9 is the catch-all code for juvenile osteochondrosis when the affected site or specific condition is not documented. It covers juvenile apophysitis NOS, juvenile epiphysitis NOS, juvenile osteochondritis NOS, and juvenile osteochondrosis NOS.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Status
- Billable
- Chapter
- 13
- Related CPT
- 10
- Region
- General
Documentation tips
What should appear in the chart to support M92.9.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify the affected bone or joint by name in the clinical note — even a generic site (e.g., 'knee,' 'ankle') unlocks a more specific M92 subcode and reduces audit exposure.
- Record the patient's age at presentation; 'juvenile' osteochondrosis is a growth-related diagnosis and age supports medical necessity for imaging and orthopedic management.
- Document imaging findings that confirm osteochondrosis (e.g., fragmentation, sclerosis, or irregularity of the ossification center) to substantiate the diagnosis over nonspecific musculoskeletal pain codes.
- If a named syndrome (e.g., Osgood-Schlatter, Sever disease, Freiberg infraction) is clinically diagnosed, document it explicitly — these map to more specific codes outside M92.9.
- Note which side is affected whenever applicable; even if the specific subcode is 'unspecified site,' laterality documentation keeps the record accurate for future encounters.
Related CPT procedures
Procedure codes commonly billed with M92.9. Linking the right diagnosis to the right procedure is what establishes medical necessity.
Source · CMS LCDs · AAOS specialty guidance · claims-pattern analysis
Common coding pitfalls
The recurring mistakes coders make with M92.9 and adjacent codes.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CDC ICD-10-CM tabular guidance, AAOS coding references, and cited references ↓
- Defaulting to M92.9 when the site is actually documented: if the note says 'juvenile osteochondrosis of the patella,' use M92.4x — not M92.9.
- Confusing M92.9 with M93 osteochondropathy codes: named conditions like Osgood-Schlatter (M92.52x) or Scheuermann disease (M42.0x) have their own codes and should never be collapsed into M92.9.
- Applying M92.9 to adult patients: 'juvenile' is a diagnostic qualifier, not just a descriptor — using this code for a skeletally mature adult without documented juvenile-onset history is incorrect.
- Skipping site-specific unspecified alternatives: M92.30 (other juvenile osteochondrosis, upper limb, unspecified) is more specific than M92.9 when the limb region is known but the exact bone is not.
- Using M92.9 as a working-diagnosis placeholder when imaging or clinical workup has already identified the site — the final coded diagnosis should reflect the documented clinical findings, not the pre-workup uncertainty.
Clinical context
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
Use M92.9 only when the clinical documentation identifies a juvenile osteochondrosis but fails to specify the anatomical site or named condition. The M92 category contains highly specific site-coded alternatives — M92.0 (humerus), M92.1 (radius/ulna), M92.2 (hand), M92.3 (other upper limb), M92.4 (patella), M92.5 (tibia/fibula), M92.6 (tarsus), M92.7 (metatarsus), and M92.8 (other specified) — all of which take precedence over M92.9 whenever the site is documented.
M92.9 applies to juvenile patients presenting with growth-related bone changes at an unspecified location, including scenarios where the clinician documents 'juvenile osteochondritis' or 'juvenile apophysitis' without naming the joint or bone. This code does not carry laterality distinctions because the site is by definition unspecified. If laterality is documented but the specific named condition is not, query the provider before defaulting to M92.9 — a site-specific code with unspecified laterality (e.g., M92.30 for unspecified other upper limb) is more precise.
This code sits within Chapter 13 (M00–M99), Osteopathies and Chondropathies subsection. No 7th-character extension applies. Do not confuse M92.9 with osteochondropathies in the M93 category (e.g., Osgood-Schlatter, Scheuermann disease, Panner disease), which have their own distinct codes and should be used when those named conditions are diagnosed.
Inclusion & exclusion notes
Per the official ICD-10-CM Tabular List.
Source · CDC ICD-10-CM Official Tabular List · 2026
Includes
- Juvenile apophysitis NOS
- Juvenile epiphysitis NOS
- Juvenile osteochondritis NOS
- Juvenile osteochondrosis NOS
Sibling codes
Other billable codes under M92 (laterality / anatomic variants).
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01When is M92.9 the correct code versus a more specific M92 subcode?
02Does M92.9 require a 7th-character extension?
03Can M92.9 be used for Osgood-Schlatter disease?
04Is M92.9 appropriate for adults who had juvenile osteochondrosis as a child?
05What CPT procedures are commonly paired with M92.9?
06Does M92.9 have laterality?
07How does M92.9 differ from codes in category M93?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CDC ICD-10-CM Tabular List 2026
- 02icd10data.comhttps://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/M00-M99/M91-M94/M92-/M92.9
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/icd-10-codes/M92.9
- 04unboundmedicine.comhttps://www.unboundmedicine.com/icd/view/ICD-10-CM/888726/all/M92_9___Juvenile_osteochondrosis__unspecified
- 05stacks.cdc.govhttp://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/158747
Mira Scribe
Mira AI Scribe captures the patient's age, the anatomical region of concern, any named clinical syndrome, imaging findings (fragmentation, sclerosis, epiphyseal irregularity), and whether laterality was stated. Recording these details at encounter time allows the coder to select the most specific M92 subcode and avoids landing on the unspecified M92.9 — which can trigger payer queries and undermine clinical specificity on longitudinal records.
See how Mira captures M92.9 documentation